How does the online Collins Dictionary define this term?
The auDA Code Of Conduct
The powers that be at 114 Cardigan Street have unilaterally introduced this Code of Conduct (see below). This applies immediately to all new Members; and for any Members that renew their memberships in June. It appears to me (and others) that certain provisions of this Code are contrary to the Constitution. But that’s a story for another day.
Double Standards? You Be The Judge
There are eight elected Directors who are Members, so presumably they fall under this Code of Conduct? I also presume that this equally applies to their dealings with fellow Directors?
What about the CEO and auDA staff who are not Members? Should they also be expected to operate under similar principles? (I’m not saying that they don’t – it’s just a question).
But here’s the big question.
♦ Should these same provisions also apply to the auDA Chair who is no longer a Member?
Or is he allowed to operate with impunity? Have a read of my article from a couple of days ago under “Threats & Admonishments”. There were a few other choice things said which I’ve chosen not to publish.
In my opinion, the Independent Chair should be held to an even higher standard. Can I now ask that the Board consider temporarily suspending the Chair “until conflicting behaviours are resolved”?
Once again, I’m not holding my breath.
What do you think?