Today, June 12th, auDA released a statement on their website regarding the reasoning behind Land.com.au dropping for the fourth time this year.
Although we believe this statement only appeared this morning, on the 12th June, auDA seem to have backdated the statement to 6th June;
In the link above, the following page is shown:
The above “reasoning” behind “why” auDA decided to place Land.com.au into Policy Delete basically remains a TOP SECRET and says NOT MUCH AT ALL.
When they say “The Panel accepts the submissions by the parties that the balance of the decision should not be published“, what does that even mean????
I’m very sure the initial party who submitted the complaint would never have agreed to HIDE and CONCEAL the details of the decision.
There have been many cases where Netfleet have been in trouble in the past (before Nikki was involved), where exact details have been publicly released.
Why not in this case?
auDA; please explain exactly WHY Land.com.au is dropping again today?
And while you’re at it, please explain how Company.com.au was secured in a highly disputable way, JUST LIKE LAND.com.au and by the SAME PEOPLE INVOLVED AS LISTED ABOVE, and you’re OKAY WITH IT?!
NOTE: The Company.com.au complaint has initially been DENIED by Steph Viljoen. We are currently escalating that complaint to an official INTERNAL REVIEW.